Hi,
> Hello.
>
> At Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:16:01 +0900 (JST), Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote in
<20181129.091601.830026250066724330.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
>> >>> Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as
>> >>> other cases you mentioned.
>> >>>
>> >>> I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment in
>> >>> psql the output would become the following:
>> >>>
>> >>> FATAL: terminating connection due to idle-in-transaction timeout
>> >>> HINT: In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the
>> >>> database and repeat your command.
>> >>
>> >>Alternative HINT message would be something like:
>> >>
>> >>HINT: In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the
>> >> database and restart your transaction.
>> >>
>> >>This could make the meaning of the error (transaction aborted) cleaner and might give
>> >>a better suggestion to the user.
>> >
>> > Agreed. Changing "command" to "transaction" seems more accurate. People might think
>> > only the command they hit is not sent but transaction is still alive though it's of course unnatural
>> > that transaction is alive after connection is terminated.
>
> "session" seems more correct and covers both (and the other
> instances below).
But "reconnect to the database" already implies "restarting session", no?
If so, "...restart your session" would sound redundant to me.
A native English speaker's comment is welcome. I may be wrong.
>> > In this case you could change the comment issued by other errors mentioned while you're at it.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Takeshi Ideriha
>>
>> I have added this to the next CF (2019-01).
>
> I found several more instances.
>
> "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery" (3 places)
> "terminating connection due to administrator command" (1 place)
>
> regards.
>
> --
> Kyotaro Horiguchi
> NTT Open Source Software Center
>
