Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?
Date
Msg-id 20181127004317.lktrahwvvwfb3dfm@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-11-26 19:34:03 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> These two things seem entirely independent in my view, so I'm really not
> sure that I'm following what you're getting at.

All I said is that I don't think it's a reasonable policy to mark all
functions that potentially could change across major versions as
immutable.  I've no problem with changing pg_config in particular,
especially as it - as has been pointed - clearly can change in minor
versions / recompiles.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: IMMUTABLE and PARALLEL SAFE function markings
Next
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: IMMUTABLE and PARALLEL SAFE function markings