On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 05:33:26PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Yeah, I also agree with 'reply_time'. But please also note that we had
> the discussion when there is not the similar system catalogs and
> fields. Now that we have them it might be worth to consider to follow
> the existing name for consistency.
The fields in pg_stat_wal_receiver are named after their respective
fields. Now if you look at the fields from pg_stat_replication, you
have those from the standby:
sent_lsn => Last write-ahead log location sent on this connection
write_lsn => Last write-ahead log location written to disk by this
standby server
flush_lsn => Last write-ahead log location flushed to disk by
this standby server
replay_lsn => Last write-ahead log location replayed into the
database on this standby server
So to keep the brand consistent, reply_time looks like the best choice
as Sawada-san suggests?
--
Michael
