On 2018-11-14 16:36:49 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:44 PM Thomas Munro
> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure if it matters whether we send the fd before or after the
> > write, but we still need some kind of global ordering of fds that can
> > order a given fd with respect to writes in other processes, so the
> > patch introduces a global shared counter captured immediately after
> > open() (including when reopened in the vfd machinery).
>
> But how do you make reading that counter atomic with the open() itself?
I don't see why it has to be. As long as the "fd generation" assignment
happens before fsync (and writes secondarily), there ought not to be any
further need for synchronizity?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
