pg11rc1 DROP INDEX: NOTICE: drop_trigger - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject pg11rc1 DROP INDEX: NOTICE: drop_trigger
Date
Msg-id 20181015191103.GA21457@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: pg11rc1 DROP INDEX: NOTICE: drop_trigger  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: pg11rc1 DROP INDEX: NOTICE: drop_trigger  (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
ts=#  CREATE INDEX ON t(i) ;
CREATE INDEX
ts=#  DROP INDEX t_i_idx ;
NOTICE:  00000: drop_trigger
LOCATION:  exec_stmt_raise, pl_exec.c:3748
DROP INDEX
ts=# 

ts=# \d t
                 Table "public.t"
 Column |  Type   | Collation | Nullable | Default 
--------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
 i      | integer |           |          | 

ts=# SELECT COUNT(1) FROM pg_trigger WHERE tgrelid='t'::regclass;
count | 0

It's not specific to the index name, since it can happen multiple times for
each index on that table:

ts=# DROP index t_i_idx2;
NOTICE:  drop_trigger
DROP INDEX
ts=# DROP index t_i_idx1;
NOTICE:  drop_trigger
DROP INDEX
ts=# 

I looked in pg_depend, but didn't see any trigger with dependency (but maybe
not doing it right):

ts=# SELECT objid::regclass, * FROM pg_depend WHERE refobjid='t_i_idx'::regclass;
(0 rows)

This doesn't occur on new tables, just this one..

"ts" is an unused database on our development VM which which I found myself
connecting to by habbit (it's the name of most of our customer DBs).  I
anticipate this may be result of catalog cruftiness resulting from upgrades
from 11dev through each of the betas.

Specifically this would've been the instance being upgraded when I wrote:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20180529171015.GA22903%40telsasoft.com

I don't know what else to look at, but wonder if there's any use in debugging
this further ?

Justin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take
Next
From: Daniele Varrazzo
Date:
Subject: Use of pager, help, localization: