On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 01:39:11PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The point about the header matching mentioned upthread is quite
> interesting as it could make the proposed feature way more useful, and
> it has not really been discussed. As far as I can see this adds more
> sanity checks in NextCopyFromRawFields(). I'd like to think that this
> should be a completely different option, say CHECK_HEADER, as CSV simply
> skips the header in COPY FROM if specified on HEAD.
It has been a couple of weeks since the last review, which has not been
addressed, so I am marking the patch as returned with feedback.
--
Michael