On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 01:02:42PM +0100, Thomas Crayford wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the pointer. It seems like the race condition I talked about
> is still accurate, does that seem right?
KeepFileRestoredFromArchive() looks like a good candidate on the matter
as it removes a WAL segment before replacing it by another with the same
name. I have a hard time understanding why the checkpointer would try
to recycle a segment just recovered though as the startup process would
immediately try to use it. I have not spent more than one hour looking
at potential spots though, which is not much for this kind of race
conditions.
It is also why I am curious about what kind of restore_command you are
using.
--
Michael
