On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 07:37:36PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Here we've got a time value that was initially given in EST (-05),
> > but was converted to UTC by timestampz_in. Then the AT TIME ZONE
> > says "Please convert this UTC value to MST, and emit it as a zoneless
> > timestamp" (which will not be subject to any further conversion when
> > it's displayed).
> >
> > The existing text is indeed a bit deficient, because it fails to
> > draw a clear boundary between what the AT TIME ZONE operator is
> > doing and what is being done by the timestamp(tz) I/O functions.
> > But you're not making it better.
>
> Yes, I am still researching and realize my diff is wrong. Let me keep
> working and I will repost.
I have developed the attached patch, which I think is an improvement.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
