On 2018-08-31 19:31:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Aug-31, David Pacheco wrote:
>
> > From reading the 9.6.3 source, it looks like the autovacuum process
> > itself is single-threaded, and it reads pages essentially linearly
> > from the relation (possibly skipping some). When the autovacuum
> > process needs to modify a page, it doesn't write it directly, but
> > rather marks the buffer dirty. The page will be written later,
>
> Unless there's some bug, there is a BufferAccessStrategy that only lets
> a few dozen buffers go unwritten before the autovac worker process
> itself is forced to write some.
I've not re-checked, but I'm not sure that's true if the buffer is
already in s_b, which it'll be for many workloads.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
