Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date
Msg-id 20180831205020.nxhw6ypysgshjtnl@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
I'm wondering what's the genesis of this coninclude column actually.
As far as I can tell, the only reason this column is there, is to be
able to print the INCLUDE clause in a UNIQUE/PK constraint in ruleutils
... but surely the same list can be obtained from the pg_index.indkey
instead?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: psql \dC incorrectly shows casts "with inout" as "binary coercible" on 9.5.14 and 11beta3
Next
From: Jean-Pierre Pelletier
Date:
Subject: Re: psql \dC incorrectly shows casts "with inout" as "binarycoercible" on 9.5.14 and 11beta3