On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:47:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I didn't want to backpatch further than v11 without a test case that would
> work in those branches, and I lacked one. If you've got out-of-core code
> you could verify it with, please do that and back-patch further.
Was there any need to patch v11 with that actually? As there is nothing
which needs except HEAD that does not seem strictly necessary.
I have reviewed the modules I have, and actually it seems that I would
not need much of that for a back-patch. One reason being that most of
my TAP tests need pg_regress so as nodes can be initialized so this
needs an external installation anyway. Maybe others have more thoughts
to offer and would prefer a back-patch.
--
Michael
