On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 03:32:28PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Ok, 2 against 1. Done.
Thanks for considering it. I have not gone in details through the patch
but...
+ (codepoint.id >= ord('A') and codepoint.id <= ord('Z')) or \
+ (codepoint.id >= 0x03b1 and codepoint.id <= 0x03c9) or \
+ (codepoint.id >= 0x0391 and codepoint.id <= 0x03a9)
... If you could add notes about what those codepoints are, or just
allocate them in a variable with a proper name, that would help with the
readability. My apologies for the nits on this thread.
--
Michael
