Re: "WIP: Data at rest encryption" patch and, PostgreSQL 11-beta3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Toshi Harada
Subject Re: "WIP: Data at rest encryption" patch and, PostgreSQL 11-beta3
Date
Msg-id 201808150211.w7F2ApMj023097@ccmail04.silk.ntt-tx.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "WIP: Data at rest encryption" patch and, PostgreSQL 11-beta3  (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: "WIP: Data at rest encryption" patch and, PostgreSQL 11-beta3
List pgsql-hackers
Hi.

Even if you apply "data-at-rest-encryption-wip-2018.07.25.patch" to the master branch, 
the same patch error will occur.
(Patch error of pg_rewind was eliminated)

----
patching file src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c
Hunk #9 FAILED at 2464.

patching file src/bin/pg_upgrade/controldata.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 58.
----
(See the attached file for the entire patch log)

Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
> Toshi Harada <harada.toshi@po.ntt-tx.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > Hi.
> > 
> > If "data-at-rest-encryption-wip-2018.07.25.patch" is applied to PostgreSQL 11-beta3 released last week, 
> > patch execution will fail as follows.
> 
> > ----
> > patching file src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c
> > Hunk #9 FAILED at 2464.
> > 
> > 1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/bin/pg_rewind/pg_rewind.c.rej
> > 
> > 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/bin/pg_upgrade/controldata.c.rej
> 
> The patch should be applicable to the master branch.
> 
> -- 
> Antonin Houska
> Cybertec Schonig & Schonig GmbH
> Grohrmuhlgasse 26, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
> Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
>

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: 王翔宇
Date:
Subject: Re: Get funcid when create function
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Facility for detecting insecure object naming