Re: Non-reserved replication slots and slot advancing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Non-reserved replication slots and slot advancing
Date
Msg-id 20180710005428.GE1661@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-reserved replication slots and slot advancing  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Non-reserved replication slots and slot advancing  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:48:28PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Jul-09, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2018-07-09 15:48:33 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > +    if (XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(MyReplicationSlot->data.restart_lsn))
> > > +    {
> > > +        ReplicationSlotRelease();
> > > +        ereport(ERROR,
> > > +                (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
> > > +                 errmsg("cannot move slot not reserving WAL")));
> > > +    }
> > > +
> >
> > I don't like this error message. It's unclear what refers to exactly
> > what.  Nor is "move" a terminology used otherwise.  How about:
> > "cannot advance replication slot that has not previously reserved WAL"
> > or something similar?

"move" is used in another error message ten lines below.

> >
> > Also, ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED doesn't quite seem right. How about
> > ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE?
>
> +1 to both of Andres' suggestions.

Those indeed sound better.  What do you think of the attached?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current
Next
From: Tatsuro Yamada
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 11 release notes