On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:48:28PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Jul-09, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2018-07-09 15:48:33 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > + if (XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(MyReplicationSlot->data.restart_lsn))
> > > + {
> > > + ReplicationSlotRelease();
> > > + ereport(ERROR,
> > > + (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
> > > + errmsg("cannot move slot not reserving WAL")));
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > I don't like this error message. It's unclear what refers to exactly
> > what. Nor is "move" a terminology used otherwise. How about:
> > "cannot advance replication slot that has not previously reserved WAL"
> > or something similar?
"move" is used in another error message ten lines below.
> >
> > Also, ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED doesn't quite seem right. How about
> > ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE?
>
> +1 to both of Andres' suggestions.
Those indeed sound better. What do you think of the attached?
--
Michael