Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning
Date
Msg-id 20180627194346.ntmuuczq7heacrhn@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-Jun-27, Amit Langote wrote:

> I noticed that there is a typo in a comment, fixed as follows in the
> attached patch.
> 
>      /*
> -     * append_rel_list is the same length as the above arrays, and holds
> +     * append_rel_array is the same length as the above arrays, and holds
>       * pointers to the corresponding AppendRelInfo entry indexed by
>       * child_relid, or NULL if none.  The array itself is not allocated if
>       * append_rel_list is empty.

Yikes.  I looked for that kind of mistake *specifically* :-(
Thanks, pushed.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow cancelling VACUUM of nbtrees with corrupted right links
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow cancelling VACUUM of nbtrees with corrupted right links