Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id 20180621211006.6mqp5jbrgl7dx3in@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade
List pgsql-hackers
In terms of pgindent, I'm surprised about these lines:

+    missingval = OidFunctionCall3(
+                                  F_ARRAY_IN,

Why did you put a newline there?  In ancient times there was a reason
for that in some cases, because pgindent would move the argument to the
left of the open parens, but it doesn't do that anymore and IMO it's
just ugly.  We have quite a few leftovers from this ancient practice,
I've been thinking about removing these ...

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Gershuni
Date:
Subject: Re: Spilling hashed SetOps and aggregates to disk
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade