Hi,
On 2018-06-05 10:40:22 -0700, serge@rielau.com wrote:
> Big +1 on this one.
Cool.
> Here is what we did. It's very crude, but minimized the amount of pain:
I think I'd rather go for my approach in core though. Needlessly
carrying around a bunch of pointers, and adding the necessary
indirections on accesses, and more allocations don't seem to buy us that
much. Nor do I really like the hackyness...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
