Re: Out of memory error with PG10.3, 10.4 but not 9.3.19 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Out of memory error with PG10.3, 10.4 but not 9.3.19
Date
Msg-id 20180516084811.GA14835@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Out of memory error with PG10.3, 10.4 but not 9.3.19  (ChatPristi <cchristo_0899@yahoo.fr>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 03:02:48PM +0000, ChatPristi wrote:
> I got the error with PG 10.3 and 10.4 on CentOS 7 up-to-date.The
> command works with a smaller size database.
> The command works with the same database with PG 9.3.19 on RHEL 6.9
> up-to-date.
>
> I attach the EXPLAIN SELECT command.

Well, instead of an explain output which takes 2.4MB compressed and
9.6MB uncompressed (take it as unreadable), could you produce a
self-contained test case with a glimpse of the schema you are using?
Where does the OOM happen, and how did you change your partitioned table
schema?  Are you using the native partitioning instead?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Philipp Kraus
Date:
Subject: Re: array_agg to array
Next
From: Philipp Kraus
Date:
Subject: sql function with empty row