Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date
Msg-id 20180510194512.vg3zfwgouxfr3esj@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
I'm thinking something like this.

The examples for runtime pruning are lame -- in the first, the text says
"watch out for Subplans Removed" and then the example provided doesn't
show one.  (That example is probably exercising the wrong thing.)

Anyway, wording suggestions for 5.10.4 and 5.10.5 in the attached file
are welcome.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: ts_rewrite in 10.4
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?