Re: ts_rewrite in 10.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: ts_rewrite in 10.4
Date
Msg-id 35421406-0E8A-4DFC-AD09-64E9B81757D3@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ts_rewrite in 10.4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On May 10, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Douglas Doole <dougdoole@gmail.com> writes:
>> The release notes say:
>> ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.ts_rewrite(tsquery, tsquery, tsquery) PARALLEL
>> UNSAFE;
>
>> But when I pull pg_proc.h from 10.4, I find:
>> DATA(insert OID = 3684 (  ts_rewrite PGNSP PGUID 12 1 0 0 0 f f f f t f i s
>> 3 0 3615 "3615 3615 3615" ...
>
>> Which I think means the function is still marked parallel safe. Am I
>> missing something?
>
> Oh ... that's a mistake in the release notes :-(.  The 3-argument form of
> ts_rewrite doesn't execute any user-supplied query; AFAICS it's not any
> less safe than anything else.  The 2-argument form runs a user-supplied
> query string, and *does* need to be marked unsafe.  So the patch got
> it right, but then we got confused while making the notes.

Updated notes in news section.  Unfortunately too late to update email :(

Thanks,

Jonathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?