Amit Langote wrote:
> Anyway, after reading your replies, I thought of taking a stab at unifying
> the partitioning information that's cached by relcache.c.
Wow. Now that's one large patch. I'm going to run with this for HEAD,
but I think we should do a minimal fix for PG10. Did you detect any
further bugs, while doing all this rework, apart from the one that
started this thread? If not, I would prefer to do commit the minimal
fix at start of thread to both branches, then apply the larger
restructuring patch to HEAD only.
For the record, I don't like the amount of code that this is putting in
relcache.c. I am thinking that most of that code will go to
src/backend/partitioning/partbounds.c instead.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
