Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two
Date
Msg-id 20180409003823.GA5158@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:04:10PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> At the end, it seems to me that what I am proposing is themost readable
> approach, and with proper documentation things should be handled
> finely...  Or there is an approach you have in mind I do not foresee?

With feature freeze which has been reached, I am marking this patch as
returned with feedback.  Please note that I have no plans to resubmit
again this patch set after this second attempt as I have no idea where
we want things to go.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christophe Pettus
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancellingbackend