At Sat, 3 Mar 2018 09:46:11 -0500, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote in
<7f1e5f2f-4902-2c29-de82-381de8cc6d66@2ndquadrant.com>
> On 3/1/18 23:39, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:27:13AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> If I understand correctly there's been no progress on this since, and
> >> there'd definitely need to be major work to get something we can agree
> >> upon. Doesn't seem v11 material. I think we should mark this as returned
> >> with feedback. Arguments against?
> >
> > Agreed with your position. The TAP tests rely on IPC::Run as a pillar
> > of its infrastructure. I think that if we need a base API to do such
> > capabilities we ought to prioritize what we can do with it first instead
> > of trying to reinvent the wheel as this patch proposes in such a
> > complicated way.
>
> I haven't seen any explanation for a problem this is solving. The
> original submission contained a sample test case, by I don't see why
> that couldn't be done with the existing infrastructure.
>
> Patch closed for now.
Agreed. This is not a v11 matter. Thanks.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
