Re: Documenting PROVE_TESTS in section of TAP tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Documenting PROVE_TESTS in section of TAP tests
Date
Msg-id 20180301095209.apele7fcimzao3tm@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Documenting PROVE_TESTS in section of TAP tests  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Documenting PROVE_TESTS in section of TAP tests  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2018-02-17 23:03:05 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The section of the documentation dedicated to TAP tests mentions
> PROVE_FLAGS:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/regress-tap.html
> 
> I think that it would be a good idea to mention PROVE_TESTS as well.  I
> personally use and abuse of it, and documenting it instead of keeping it
> hidden in Makefile.global.in is good for new developers and testers.
> 
> Proposal of patch attached.

Good plan.

> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml
> index 53716a029f..d14318053b 100644
> --- a/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml
> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml
> @@ -675,6 +675,17 @@ make -C src/bin check PROVE_FLAGS='--timer'
>      See the manual page of <command>prove</command> for more information.
>     </para>
>  
> +   <para>
> +    The <command>make</command> variable <varname>PROVE_TESTS</varname>
> +    can be used to define a whitespace-separated list of paths relative
> +    to the <filename>Makefile</filename> invoking <command>prove</command>
> +    to run a subset of tests instead of the default
> +    <filename>t/*.pl</filename>.  For example:
> +<programlisting>
> +make check PROVE_TESTS='t/001_test1.pl t/003_test3.pl'
> +</programlisting>
> +   </para>
> +

Pushed, after replacing "a subset" with "the specified subset".

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Minor fix for pgbench documentation
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: 2018-03 Commitfest starts tomorrow