On 2018-02-27 16:20:28 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > IOW, I think a fair response to this is "if you're using logrotate with > > Postgres, you're doing it wrong". That was of some use back before we > > spent so much sweat on the syslogger, but it's not a reasonable setup > > today. > > > > A couple of weeks ago a message was posted to general [1] in which I > concluded the desired behavior is not supported natively. I'm curious > whether better advice than mine can be given ... > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAKoQ0XHAy9De1C8gxUWHSW6w5iKcqX03wyWGe_%2Bc8NxJccCBHw%40mail.gmail.com#CAKoQ0XHAy9De1C8gxUWHSW6w5iKcqX03wyWGe_+c8NxJccCBHw@mail.gmail.com That link appears to be broken. Real one https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKoQ0XHAy9De1C8gxUWHSW6w5iKcqX03wyWGe_+c8NxJccCBHw@mail.gmail.com
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных