On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:45:17PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2/20/18 23:04, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I think that crypto_hash.c or hash_crypt.c would be adapted as well.
>> crypt.c is too much generic, so including both concepts in the name is
>> the way to go. The name given by Tom here sounds actually nice.
>
> Updated patches
I have been reviewing both patches, and those look good to me.
git diff --check has one complain:
src/backend/utils/adt/cryptohashes.c:170: new blank line at EOF.
--
Michael
