Re: spin.c includes pg_sema.h even if unnecessary - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: spin.c includes pg_sema.h even if unnecessary
Date
Msg-id 20180215180157.7q55aytrhif7vvzw@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to spin.c includes pg_sema.h even if unnecessary  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: spin.c includes pg_sema.h even if unnecessary  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-02-15 20:11:07 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> As in another mail just before, spin.c seems a bit strange
> (without acutual harm).
> 
> spin.h doesn't include pg_sema.h when HAVE_SPINLOCKS is defined,
> but spin.c always includes it even in the case. The file is
> included only to use sizeof(PGSemaphore) to calcualte
> SpinlockSemaSize as 0.
> 
> The codes that requires PGSempaphore is inactivated when the
> symbol is defined in all other places so it seems to me that we
> ought to refrain from using it there, too. The attched patch does

IDK, I don't quite see the point of the change here...

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Add void cast to StaticAssertExpr?