Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date
Msg-id 20180208175821.5rpwefzhrbi2wss6@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses reorganizing partitioning code (was: Re: [HACKERS] path toward fasterpartition pruning)  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> > partition.c seems to have two kinds of functions 1. that build and
> > manage relcache, creates quals from bounds etc. which are metadata
> > management kind 2. partition bound comparison functions, and other
> > optimizer related functions. May be we should divide the file that
> > way. The first category code remains in catalog/ as it is today. The
> > second catagory functions move to optimizer/.
> 
> It would be sensible to separate functions that build and manage data
> in the relcache from other functions.  I think we should consider
> moving the existing functions of that type from partition.c to
> src/backend/utils/cache/partcache.c.

FWIW I've been thinking that perhaps we need some other separation of
code better than statu quo.  The current partition.c file includes stuff
for several modules and ISTM all these new patches are making more and
more of a mess.  So +1 to the general idea of splitting things up.
Maybe partcache.c is not ambitious enough, but it seems a good first
step.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Query running for very long time (server hanged) with parallel append
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: partition pruning by secondary attributes