Hi,
On 2018-01-29 15:16:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Also zero-initialize all scratch ExprEvalStep's allocated on the
> > stack, to avoid issues with similar future omissions of non-critial
> > data.
>
> Dunno that that's a good idea; it will also serve to hide valid warnings.
Possible, but I think it's more likely that new fields with default to
zero/NULL anyway. Zero initializing around allocations is a pretty
common thing in the PG codebase, so it does feel consistent to me.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
