On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:51:28AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> While reading copy.c I noticed this line:
>
>
> #define RAW_BUF_SIZE 65536 /* we palloc RAW_BUF_SIZE+1 bytes */
>
>
> Doesn't that seem rather odd? If we're adding 1 wouldn't it be better as
> 65535 so we palloc a power of 2?
>
>
> I have no idea if this affects performance, but it did strike me as strange.
Coming in late here, but it does seem very odd.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
