Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date
Msg-id 20180119140458.lkes4vffhg2enwjx@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Jesper

Jesper Pedersen wrote:

> I get
> 
> pg_restore: creating INDEX "pg_catalog.pg_authid_oid_index"
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC:
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 5493; 1259 2677 INDEX
> pg_authid_oid_index jpedersen
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR:  permission
> denied: "pg_authid" is a system catalog
>     Command was:
> -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_class oids
> SELECT pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_index_pg_class_oid('2677'::pg_catalog.oid);
> 
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "pg_authid_oid_index" ON "pg_authid" USING "btree"
> ("oid");
> 
> during check-world.

Wow, thanks for reporting.  That's freaking weird ...  Maybe I need to
use a more restrictive condition.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nikolay Shaplov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Refuse setting toast.* reloptions when TOAST table does not exist
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes betweenpg_dump and pg_dumpall