Re: postgresql9.5 partition table - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: postgresql9.5 partition table
Date
Msg-id 20171229134604.2sqdt56sfhtknkct@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to postgresql9.5 partition table  (mark <pgroad@163.com>)
Responses Re: postgresql9.5 partition table
List pgsql-general
mark wrote:
> I defined a table using 1000 partition tables.
> When I deleted or updated this table. It used a lot of memory and
> postmaster process is killed by OS. When I defined the same table
> using 100 partition tables. It can normally be updated and deleted.
> what is reason of this?

Postgres 9.5 is not prepared to deal with thousands of partitions.

You can try the improved partitioning with the new syntax introduced in
Postgres 10 -- you may have better luck there.  Please test it.
If it still doesn't work, let us know in detail what you tested and how
it failed.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: mark
Date:
Subject: postgresql9.5 partition table
Next
From: mark
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql9.5 partition table