Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Inlining functions with "expensive" parameters - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Inlining functions with "expensive" parameters
Date
Msg-id 20171121164416.m7wwvvg3g5demef4@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inlining functions with "expensive" parameters  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,

On 2017-11-21 10:16:58 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm also wondering about folding CaseTestExpr and CoerceToDomainValue
> into the same mechanism.  It's not very hard to see those cases as
> being the same as a function-based lambda.

Yea, that'd be good. The current mechanisms is uh, historically grown.

- Andres

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Inlining functions with "expensive" parameters
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Does XMLSERIALIZE output xmlattributes in a stable order?