Re: [BUGS] BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request
Date
Msg-id 20171110232304.fgeoubpgqrkng77o@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 2017-11-10 18:06:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Interesting.  I wonder whether __int128 has an alignment requirement that
> is more than MAXALIGN.  Intel chips generally don't enforce alignment
> requirements, but maybe there's an exception here?

As long as no SIMD instructions are used... Which'd be compiler version
and flag specific.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request
Next
From: digoal@126.com
Date:
Subject: [BUGS] BUG #14899: not null constraint cann't improve the planner