Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Wong, Yi Wen <yiwong@amazon.com> wrote:
> > Yesterday, I've been spending time with pg_visibility on the pages when I reproduce the issue in 9.6.
> > None of the all-frozen or all-visible bits are necessarily set in problematic pages.
>
> Since this happened yesterday, I assume it was with an unfixed version?
>
> As you must have seen, Alvaro said he has a variant of Dan's original
> script that demonstrates that a problem remains, at least on 9.6+,
> even with today's fix. I think it's the stress-test that plays with
> fillfactor, many clients, etc [1].
I just execute setup.sql once and then run this shell command,
while :; do
psql -e -P pager=off -f ./repro.sql
for i in `seq 1 5`; do
psql -P pager=off -e --no-psqlrc -f ./lock.sql &
done
wait && psql -P pager=off -e --no-psqlrc -f ./reindex.sql
psql -P pager=off -e --no-psqlrc -f ./report.sql
echo "done"
done
Note that you need to use pg10's psql because of the \if lines in
lock.sql. For some runs I change the values to compare random() to, and
originally the commented out section in lock.sql was not commented out,
but I'm fairly sure the failures I saw where with this version. Also, I
sometime change the 5 in the `seq` command to higher values (180, 250).
I didn't find the filler column to have any effect, so I took that out.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
