Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm potentially willing to commit a patch that just makes the
> pg_hypot() -> hypot() change and does nothing else, if there are not
> objections to that change, but I want to be sure that we'll know right
> away if that turns out to break.
Uh, I thought pg_hypot() was still needed on our oldest supported
platforms. Or is hypot() already supported there? If not, I suppose we
can keep the HYPOT() macro, and have it use hypot() on platforms that
have it and pg_hypot elsewhere? That particular fraction of 0001 seemed
a bit dubious to me, as the largest possible source of platform
dependency issues.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
