Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/4/17 06:03, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> >>> I don't like breaking the abstraction of pg_log() with the existing
> >>> flags with some kind of pg_debug() layer. The set of APIs present now
> >>> in pg_rewind for logging is nice to have, and I think that those debug
> >>> messages should be translated. So what about the attached?
> >>
> >> Your point about INT64_FORMAT not necessarily working with fprintf
> >> is an outstanding reason not to keep it like it is. I've not reviewed
> >> this patch in detail but I think this is basically the way to fix it.
> >
> > Actually this code goes throgh vsnprintf, not fprintf, which should be
> > safe, so I removed that part of the comment, and pushed.
>
> Is there a reason this was not backpatched to 9.5?
No, I'll backpatch later.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
