Hi,
On 2017-08-09 16:30:03 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > One particular table before vacuum full:
> >
> > relname | relminmxid | table_size
> > ------------------------------+------------+------------
> > delayed_jobs | 1554151198 | 21 GB
> >
> > And after vacuum full:
> >
> > relname | relminmxid | table_size
> > --------------+------------+------------
> > delayed_jobs | 1554155465 | 6899 MB
> >
> > Shouldn't be the relminmxid changed after vacuum full, or am I not
> > understanding something?
FWIW, VACUUM FULL isn't a good tool to use here. It's commonly way more
expensive than a normal vacuum (it rewrites the entire table, and
rebuilds indexes).
> But it did change ... the problem is that it didn't change enough (only
> 4000 multixacts). Maybe your multixact freeze min age is too high?
> Getting rid of 15 GB of bloat is a good side effect, though, I'm sure.
I wonder if there's longrunning transactions preventing cleanup. I
suggest checking pg_stat_activity, pg_prepared_xacts,
pg_replication_slot for older stuff.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
