Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hmm, yeah, that's not good. However, I didn't like the idea of putting
> it inside the locked area, as it's too much code. Instead I added just
> before acquiring the spinlock. We cancel the sleep unconditionally
> later on if we didn't need to sleep after all.
I just noticed that Jacana failed again in the subscription test, and it
looks like it's related to this. I'll take a look tomorrow if no one
beats me to it.
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=jacana&dt=2017-07-26%2014%3A39%3A54
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
