Hi,
(please don't top-reply on this list)
On 2017-07-19 14:04:39 +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:10:49 -0400
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your comments. I understand the problem of my proposal
> patch.
Does that mean you're trying to rewrite it in the way that was
suggested:
> > > Another,
> > > pretty half-baked, approach would be to add a procsignal triggering idle
> > > backends to send stats, and send that to all idle backends when querying
> > > stats. We could even publish the number of outstanding stats updates in
> > > PGXACT or such, without any locking, and send it only to those that have
> > > outstanding ones.
> >
> > If somebody wanted to do the work, that'd be a viable answer IMO. You'd
> > really want to not wake backends that have nothing more to send, but
> > I agree that it'd be possible to advertise that in shared memory.
or are you planning to just let the issue leave be?
- Andres
