Hi,
On 2017-07-06 20:26:29 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > But is this possible, or feasible? I see that the makefile refers to
>
> Possible yes, but in general I'm not a big fan of duplicating code. I
> spend too much time to keep those copies in sync.
Indeed. I'm quite strongly against exposing / using pgtypeslib in more
places. If anything it should be phased out. Because that code is
definitely not always kept up2date, and it's a lot of work to do so. If
anything the code should be rewritten to *not* require so much
duplication, then we could talk.
> > How much of the source tree would I have to carve out?
> > Or from another perspective; how do other language (if any) solve this?
>
> I'm not aware of any other language binding for pgtypeslib.
Some people use http://libpqtypes.esilo.com/
Greetings,
Andres Freund
