> You're right that the statement is irrelevant in the context of what
> a standby can or can't do, but what I'm worried about is that someone
> will read it and believe that it represents the whole truth about
> what read-only master transactions can do. The previous wording was
> also irrelevant to the context of a standby, and yet this whole thread
> exists because somebody complained that it's an inaccurate description
> of the restrictions on such a master transaction. Well, it's still
> inaccurate.
Then I think we should add more commands including ANALYZE, VACUUM and
strong LOCKS here. There's no specific reason to pick up only
nextval(), LISTEN and NOTIFY.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
