Re: [HACKERS] PG10 Crash-safe and replicable Hash Indexes and UNIQUE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG10 Crash-safe and replicable Hash Indexes and UNIQUE
Date
Msg-id 20170530170134.GE2648@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG10 Crash-safe and replicable Hash Indexes and UNIQUE  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:01:57PM -0400, Chapman Flack wrote:
> ? A transformOpclassLike function could verify that foo and the opcintype
> of int4_ops have the same typlen and typbyval, and that the operators and
> support procs are backed by C functions, and return a list of
> CREATE OPERATOR reusing the same functions, followed by the rewritten
> CREATE OPERATOR CLASS.
> 
> Would it be helpful to link any part of these notes to the hash index
> section of the TODO page?

I added a link to this excellent summary email based on the first
paragraph alone:
Add UNIQUE capability to hash indexes 

then when I got to your suggestion at the bottom, it was already done. 
:-)

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus build failure on s390x