* Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > tureba@gmail.com writes:
> >> It seems that pg_dump -c fails when the database doesn't have a 'public'
> >> schema. When using a clean database, then dropping (or renaming) the
> >> 'public' schema, a subsequent pg_dump -c tells me:
> >
> >> $ pg_dump -c test
> >> pg_dump: [archiver (db)] query failed: ERROR: schema "public" does not exist
> >> LINE 1: ...::regclass AND pip.objsubid = 0 AND pip.objoid <> 'public'::...
> >> ^
> >
> >> This seems to have started in commit 330b84d8c4
> >
> > Yeah, this is not cool. Stephen?
>
> This is visibly an oversight of the recent commit 330b84d, which is
> broken on its face because it does not check for the existence of this
> schema. One simple fix would be to extend this query with a SELECT
> CASE ... ELSE 0 FROM pg_namespace WHERE nspname = 'public' but that's
> ugly.
I would think using a coalesce() would be a bit cleaner, as in:
! appendPQExpBuffer(query,
! " AND pip.objoid <> "
! "coalesce((select oid from pg_namespace "
! "where nspname = 'public'),0)");
Attached is a patch which fixes this issue in that way and includes
changes to the TAP tests to check this case. The TAP tests are a bit
much to back-patch, I guess, since it involves adding the ability to
have multiple databases to the 002_pg_dump.pl framework, but hopefully
there won't be objections to adding that into master. This may also
provide an initial step towards folding 010_dump_connstr.pl into
002_pg_dump.pl and therefore possibly removing the need for another
cluster to be created during the pg_dump TAP tests and hopefully
reducing their overall runtime.
Thanks!
Stephen
