Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Date
Msg-id 20170505030002.rn63hfynu25fp6v7@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2017-05-04 19:57:21 -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> One thought, is that we treat a CTE in a similar way to foreign tables,
> with the same set of push downs.

A bit surprised about that suggestion - there seems to be very little
similarity between the cases. What'd be the benefit of that?  With FDWs
there's not even a common set of things pushed down between different
FDW users.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] compiler warning with VS 2017