Hi,
On 2017-04-25 13:39:07 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Understood, but the question is whether the release notes are the right
> place to educate users of something that will no longer be a problem.
I think it's the *prime* place for it. It obviously doesn't matter if
you're not affected by $performance_problem, but if you are affected,
then it's quite likely going to be important. Deciding whether to
migrate to a new version will often be a decision about a *lot* of work,
so it'll not be made lightly, and without a motivator.
If we go by that logic, why are we listing parallelism? Why are we
listing new planner/executor features that lead to faster plans? The
reason we do, is that they're addressing concerns that users had, which
they need to know about.
> I am happy to adjust things to whatever the community wants, but, on the
> other hand I have a responsibility to be consistent what what they have
> wanted in the past.
Why?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
