Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Date
Msg-id 20170425032942.GF7513@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:05:41PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I think the above commit needs a separate mention, as this is a really
> > huge step forward to control the size of hash indexes.
> 
> Yes, it is unfotunate that the item is in the incompatibility item.  I
> wonder if I should split out the need to rebuild the hash indexes and
> keep it there and move this item into the "Index" section.

Done, items split.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes