On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:14:23PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> >>>>> Are these votes for getting rid of both win32.mak and bcc32.mak?
> >
> >> PFA a patch that does this. Did I miss something? :)
> >
> > Perhaps we should get rid of the WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER symbol altogether;
> > given this patch, "#ifdef WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER" could be replaced by
> > "#ifdef _MSC_VER".
>
> That's here in the patch for people wondering:
> -#if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__)
> +#if defined(_MSC_VER)
> #define WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER
> #endif
> +1 for the renaming.
>
>
> Ok, since we have two votes for it, I will go ahead and do that (as a separate
> patch pushed together).'
I am fine with removing things, but I do remember one reason the Borland
part was kept is that some tool would only work with the
Borland-compiled library, not gcc or MSVC, but that was long ago.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
