On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:50:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> >> I think that what would actually be of some use nowadays is a LOG-level
> >> message emitted if the wraparound *isn't* activated immediately at start.
> >> But otherwise, we should follow the rule that silence is golden.
>
> > Concretely, how about the attached? It preserves the original
> > "protections are now enabled" message at LOG level, but emits it only
> > when oldestOffsetKnown becomes true *after* startup. Meanwhile, if
> > oldestOffsetKnown is still not true at the conclusion of TrimMultiXact,
> > then it emits a new LOG message about "protections are not active".
>
> I realized that the second of these is not necessary because it's
> redundant with the message about "MultiXact member wraparound protections
> are disabled because oldest checkpointed MultiXact %u does not exist on
> disk". Pushed without that.
Gee, I kind of like the new messages:
LOG: listening on IPv4 address "127.0.0.1", port 5432LOG: listening on Unix socket "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432"
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
