Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE
Date
Msg-id 20170310020656.fgnyxezogincj7up@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> (And no, I don't especially
> approve of RELKIND_SEQUENCE being 'S' either, but it's far too late to
> change that.)

FWIW the reason SEQUENCE uses S instead of 's' is that the latter was
taken for "special" relations, which we removed a few releases ago
(commit 3a694bb0a1).

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSOC Introduction / Eliminate O(N^2) scaling fromrw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions